In what sense is Du Châtelet an intermediary between Leibniz and Kant? How close is Du Châtelet to the philosophy of Leibniz or the ideas of Wolff, and how near is Kant to the ideas of Du Châtelet?
-
Project Description
Can Kant’s claim that his philosophy differs from Leibniz concerning his interpretation of phenomena, the knowledge of their origin and essence, be detected in Du Châtelet’s philosophy as well?
Eberhard tries to prove that Kant’s ideas were not as “original” as he had claimed. If Kant’s ideas can be tied back to Leibniz-Wolffian philosophy, is this also true for Du Châtelet? If this is an invalid claim for an adequate understanding of Kant, is it consequently also inadequate for Du Châtelet?
-
Activities: Libori Summer School 2018
Areins Pelayo Leibniz “Tentamen Anagogicum” Libori Summer School 2018
Lisa Benossi Lambert Kant Libori Summerschool 2018 presentation
Hartmut Hecht Leibniz on SpaceTime Libori Summer School 2018_2
Suisky Du Châtelet and Kant – the Predecessors Libori-Summer School-2018
Reichenberger Andrea Christian Wolff_Space and Time Libori Summer School 2018
Hagengruber Du Châtelet and the Eberhard Kant Controversy Libori Summer School 2018