Can Kant’s claim that his philosophy differs from Leibniz concerning his interpretation of phenomena, the knowledge of their origin and essence, be detected in Du Châtelet’s philosophy as well?

Eberhard tries to prove that Kant’s ideas were not as “original” as he had claimed. If Kant’s ideas can be tied back to Leibniz-Wolffian philosophy, is this also true for Du Châtelet? If this is an invalid claim for an adequate understanding of Kant, is it consequently also inadequate for Du Châtelet?

Areins Pelayo Leibniz “Tentamen Anagogicum” Libori Summer School 2018

Lisa Benossi Lambert Kant Libori Summerschool 2018 presentation

Hartmut Hecht Leibniz on SpaceTime Libori Summer School 2018_2

Suisky Du Châtelet and Kant – the Predecessors Libori-Summer School-2018

Reichenberger Andrea Christian Wolff_Space and Time Libori Summer School 2018

Hagengruber Du Châtelet and the Eberhard Kant Controversy Libori Summer School 2018

2019 Hagengruber Hecht (Hrs): Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung, Springer.

Hagengruber-Hecht

2019 Hagengruber: Emilie Du Châtelet zwischen Leibniz und Kant. Die Eberhard Kant Kontroverse, in: Hagengruber Hecht (ed.)Emilie Du Châtelet und die deutsche Aufklärung, Springer, 173-195.

2019 Hagengruber Du Châtelet between Leibniz and Kant

Primary Sources and Online Links