BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//History of Women Philosophers and Scientists - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:History of Women Philosophers and Scientists
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for History of Women Philosophers and Scientists
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260311T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260311T173000
DTSTAMP:20260409T211942
CREATED:20260318T113639Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260318T122254Z
UID:32893-1773221400-1773250200@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Talk by Ruth E. Hagengruber: The History of Women Philosophers and its Role in the Future of Global Philosophizing
DESCRIPTION:On March 11th\, Ruth E. Hagengruber gave a talk at the international workshop Futures of Philosophizing – On the Transformation of the Philosophy Curriculum at the University of Hildesheim. The workshop took place from March 10 to March 13\, 2026\, and was organized by the Research Center for Advanced Studies GloPhi (Philosophizing in a Globalized World)\, Rolf Elberfeld\, Birgit Benzing\, Lerato Posholi\, and Abbed Kanoor.\n\nFor more information on the program\, see here.\n\n\nAbstract:\nWhat is the common feature of all philosophical traditions around the world\, and globally? – The exclusion of womens ideas is a key element to all philosophical traditions\, globally.\n\n\nConclusion 1 : Every institutionalised philosophical tradition was created to the exclusion of women’s ideas and must therefore be regarded as a dominant strategy that is essentially and necessarily linked to this dominant characteristic\n\nConclusion 2: why should the accumulation of these dominant strategies result in anything else than one big philosophy of oppression?
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/talk-by-ruth-e-hagengruber-the-history-of-women-philosophers-and-its-role-in-the-future-of-global-philosophising/
LOCATION:Hildesheim University
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260311T180000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260311T200000
DTSTAMP:20260409T211942
CREATED:20260119T115513Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260303T070809Z
UID:32530-1773252000-1773259200@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Talk by Jil Muller - Olismo in Oliva Sabuco ed Elisabetta di Boemia
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Jil Muller will give her talk in the seminar “La filosofia delle donne 2025-2026 Temi e concetti del pensiero filosofico femminile” at Università di Trento. \nAbstract of the Talk \nOliva Sabuco ed Elisabetta di Boemia adottano entrambe un approccio medico allo studio dell’essere umano inteso come un tutto unificato\, ma lo fanno partendo da presupposti filosofici nettamente diversi. Nella Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre (1587)\, Sabuco concepisce l’essere umano come un’unità integrata la cui salute e vita morale dipendono dall’armoniosa relazione tra corpo e anima. Tale unità\, tuttavia\, si fonda su una chiara separazione ontologica tra i due: l’anima e il corpo sono distinti per natura\, ma la loro interazione\, specialmente attraverso le passioni\, ha effetti fisiologici e psicologici diretti. Per Sabuco\, riconoscere questa distinzione è proprio ciò che permette di comprendere come gli stati mentali possano influenzare la salute del corpo e come le condizioni fisiche possano influire sull’anima\, preservando così una visione olistica senza far collassare i due in un’unica sostanza. Elisabetta di Boemia\, invece\, mette in discussione la coerenza stessa di tale separazione. Nella sua corrispondenza con Cartesio\, sfida notoriamente il dualismo cartesiano chiedendosi come una mente immateriale possa interagire causalmente con un corpo materiale. Per Elisabetta\, l’essere umano non può essere adeguatamente compreso se la mente e il corpo sono concepiti come sostanze radicalmente distinte\, poiché ciò rende la loro interazione oscura e filosoficamente insoddisfacente. Le sue riflessioni suggeriscono che una comprensione autentica dell’essere umano nel suo insieme richiede un ripensamento della natura dell’anima\, del corpo e del concetto stesso di causalità. \n  \nOliva Sabuco and Elisabeth of Bohemia both adopt a medical approach to the study of the human being as a unified whole\, but they do so starting from distinctly different philosophical assumptions. In Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre (1587)\, Sabuco conceives of the human being as an integrated unit whose health and moral life depend on the harmonious relationship between body and soul. This unity\, however\, is based on a clear ontological separation between the two: the soul and the body are distinct by nature\, but their interaction\, especially through the passions\, has direct physiological and psychological effects. For Sabuco\, recognising this distinction is precisely what allows us to understand how mental states can influence the health of the body and how physical conditions can affect the soul\, thus preserving a holistic view without collapsing the two into a single substance. Elisabeth of Bohemia\, on the other hand\, questions the very coherence of this separation. In her correspondence with Descartes\, she famously challenges Cartesian dualism by asking how an immaterial mind can interact causally with a material body. For Elisabeth\, human beings cannot be adequately understood if the mind and body are conceived as radically distinct substances\, as this makes their interaction obscure and philosophically unsatisfactory.His reflections suggest that a genuine understanding of the human being as a whole requires a rethinking of the nature of the soul\, the body\, and the very concept of causality. \n 
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/talk-by-jil-muller-la-filosofia-delle-donne-2025-2026-temi-e-concetti-del-pensiero-filosofico-femminile/
CATEGORIES:Talk
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/wp-content/uploads/Locandina_pensiero-femminile_20260128_225441_0000.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR