BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//History of Women Philosophers and Scientists - ECPv6.15.18//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for History of Women Philosophers and Scientists
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Rome
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210506T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210506T180000
DTSTAMP:20260405T063403
CREATED:20220121T161309Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220121T161309Z
UID:20189-1620316800-1620324000@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Clara Carus: Emilie du Chatelet’s Concept of ‘a Being’
DESCRIPTION:Thursday\, 06. May 2021\, 4 pm (CEST)\nDR. CLARA CARUS (UNIVERSITY of PADERBORN)\nÉmilie du Châtelet’s Concept of ‘a Being’\n\n\nIn paragraph 35 of her Institutions Physiques Du Châtelet determines a being [un Etre] as that which can exist and whose determinations do not entail a contradiction. Along with her predecessor Wolff\, she deems the determination of a being (a ‘thing’ in Wolff) to rest on a rational principle of non-contradiction: if I can prove that an idea is free of contradiction it is possible and thus a being – if an idea entails a contradiction it is a chimera. In her determination of a being\, Du Châtelet makes clear that a being merely needs to be possible\, i.e. non-contradictory to be a being – it does not need to be existing in actuality. Along with this definition of “a being”\, to Du Châtelet all truths rest on the principle of non-contradiction. It is thus clear from Du Châtelet’s understanding of a being that we reject an idea which entails contradiction not on the basis of ‘existence’ but on the basis of a reasoned principle. The determination of a being is dependent upon a principle of knowledge – not upon the existence of beings and the experience thereof. She hoped to pass judgments on nature on the basis of this principle\, but also on freedom\, God and knowledge itself. Yet is non-contradiction really sufficient to establish ‘a being’ – a necessary truth?\n\n\nAll welcome. Please register for the lecture here:\n\n\nhttps://womeninphilosophy.com/lecture-series/ \n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Zoom link will be sent to all registered participants on the day of the lecture\, one hour before the start of the talk.
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/clara-carus-emilie-du-chatelets-concept-of-a-being/
CATEGORIES:Talk
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210508T143000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210508T170000
DTSTAMP:20260405T063403
CREATED:20210503T122911Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221219T151149Z
UID:18242-1620484200-1620493200@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Ruth E. Hagengruber: The Stolen History—Retrieving the History of Women Philosophers and Its Methodical Implications
DESCRIPTION:Throughout the last 40 years\, many scholars have dedicated their endeavors to conserving the writings of women philosophers. Now we have access to valuable sources that show that the history of women philosophers stretches back as far as the history of philosophy itself. Using the history of women philosophers as a methodical approach to philosophy is a unique and indispensable means to widen and to change philosophical insights. Re-reading the history of philosophy and including the ideas of women philosophers\, however\, does not only add some more narratives but challenges the methodology of philosophy. The history of philosophy that we are traditionally educated in the western world is simply not true to the facts. Thus\, I demand a rewriting of the history of philosophy that takes into account the ideas that are incorporated in the writings of women philosophers and that have been denied by the narratives and fabric of sexualized and patriarchally influenced thought. \nThe event will include a panel discussion with Prof. Dr. Hagengruber\, Prof. Dr. Monika Kirloskar-Steinbach and Dr. Chris Meyns\, chaired by Dr. Liesbeth Schoonheim. Column by Joyce Pijnenburg\, MA. The event will take place through Zoom (14.30-17.00h CET); for further details see our site.
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/ruth-e-hagengruber-the-stolen-history-retrieving-the-history-of-women-philosophers-and-its-methodical-implications/
LOCATION:online
CATEGORIES:Talk
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/00-Ruth-Hagengruber.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210520
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210522
DTSTAMP:20260405T063403
CREATED:20210203T082611Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210524T203046Z
UID:16658-1621468800-1621641599@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Stein’s and Husserl’s Intertwined Itineraries 1916-25
DESCRIPTION:Edith Stein attempted already in her doctorate to complement Husserl’s work on phenomenology by a painstaking analysis of empathy including its indispensable role in the constitution of the psycho-physical individual and the person. As Husserl’s assistant 1918-20 she famously edited in particular his Ideas II\, perhaps introducing within it a view of this relationship foreign to Husserl’s. This conference attempts to shed light on this matter by bringing into focus the integrity and coherence of their respective contributions in advance of the appearance of the new and revised edition of Ideas II. The The focus of this conference and its theme are on Husserl and Stein’s respective understanding of the constitution of the body\, and its importance for intersubjectivity and transcendental phenomenology. \nConference organizer: \nRuth E. Hagengruber\, Center HWPS/Padeborn University\, Germany \nMette Lebech\, Maynooth University\, Ireland \nThe conference will take place from May 20 to May 21 2021 as an online conference. The preliminary program is available at the conference page. A link to the Zoom event will announced in time. \nFor more information visit our conference page. \n 
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/phenomenological-intersubjectivity-phenomenology-of-intersubjectivity-edith-stein-and-edmund-husserls-contributions-1917-1925-in-the-light-of-ideas-ii/
LOCATION:Paderborn University\, Warburger Str. 100\, Paderborn\, NRW\, 33098\, Germany
CATEGORIES:Conference
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/202102_SteinHusserl-03.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210521T113000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210521T130000
DTSTAMP:20260405T063403
CREATED:20210412T163255Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221219T151207Z
UID:17980-1621596600-1621602000@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Ruth E. Hagengruber: From Quantitative to Qualitative Food Economics: Food in the Age of AI
DESCRIPTION:International Conference  \nCultural diversity and biodiversity: the question of food \nRuth Edith Hagengruber\, Paderborn University\,\nTeaching and Research Area EcoTechGender \n Session II Food and cultural diversity \nIndividualized need and globalized food provision will substantially change the idea of growth economics. Not for the first time in our history\, food is the enhancer of a global change in economics. This time\, the change will take the direction from a quantity based (food) economics to a quality based one.  Individualized and value driven food economics impacts a change in established growth economics and will change substantially our idea of economy. AI can be used and can support an individualized and quality determined food request and thus also change our idea of food production and provision. In the process\, all fields will change: demand\, production and logistics. This quality-based economy contains an opportunity to address today’s challenges for an economy that conserves resources and protects the environment\, while at the same time taking greater account of individual and different needs. \nFind more information here.
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/ruth-e-hagengruber-from-quantitative-to-qualitative-food-economics-food-in-the-age-of-ai/
CATEGORIES:Talk
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/WZB-6-DAB-REHagengrugber-e1618240165851.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210527T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20210527T160000
DTSTAMP:20260405T063403
CREATED:20210526T202835Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221219T151235Z
UID:18410-1622124000-1622131200@historyofwomenphilosophers.org
SUMMARY:Ruth E. Hagengruber: A Stolen History. A Critical Examination of the History of Philosophy and a Plea for a New Renaissance.
DESCRIPTION:The International Philosophy Olympiads (IPO)\, which is a competition for high-school pupils\, first took place in 1993\, by an initiative of the Department of Philosophy of Sofıa University to invite a group of philosophers from various countries. \nMain topics for discussion at eIPO 2021 will be:\n1) Realism versus Idealism in political philosophy: throughout the history of political philosophy and politics\, there has been continual debate about the roles of idealism versus realism. For contemporary political philosophy\, this debate manifests in notions of ideal theory versus nonideal theory. Nonideal thinkers shift their focus from theorizing about full social justice\, asking instead which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society more just. Ideal thinkers\, on the other hand\, question whether full justice is a standard that any society is likely ever to satisfy. And\, if social justice is unrealistic\, are attempts to understand it without value or importance\, and merely utopian?\n2) Interpretations of key utopian and anti-utopian texts to demonstrate how they construct\, challenge and explore the ideas and forms of social phenomenons in the past and present. earlier utopian writings and the social and political ideals of their own periods\n3) Is contemporary culture a prove of utopian eclipse by the dystopian narratives?\n4) How to set ambitious goals and practical principles for creating a desirable society?\n5) What is the role of utopian thinking in critical thinking? \nMore information can be found on the eIPO website. \n 
URL:https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/ruth-e-hagengruber-a-stolen-history/
CATEGORIES:Talk
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR